Whipple, Dorothy. Random Commentary. Michael Joseph.
22
Connections | Author name Sort descending | Excerpt |
---|---|---|
Publishing | Dorothy Whipple | Again she felt sure the book would be a failure, judging it not properly thought out in the beginning, about nothing—stale, flat. Whipple, Dorothy. Random Commentary. Michael Joseph. 22 |
Reception | Dorothy Whipple | A reader at Curtis Brown
praised DW
's very shrewd and natural gift of depicting her middle-class characters, while Lord Gorell
at John Murray
wrote: Much her best work and the former was good. Whipple, Dorothy. Random Commentary. Michael Joseph. 23 |
Reception | Dorothy Whipple | Colonel
and Mrs Williams
, the owners of Parciau, were far from pleased at finding themselves and their lives portrayed in fiction. Conville, David, and Dorothy Whipple. “Afterword”. The Priory, Persephone Books, pp. 529-36. 533 Whipple, Dorothy. Random Commentary. Michael Joseph. 99 |
Reception | Dorothy Whipple | They Were Sisters too became a Book Society
Choice. Whipple, Dorothy. Random Commentary. Michael Joseph. 147 Whipple, Dorothy. Random Commentary. Michael Joseph. 152 |
Reception | Dorothy Whipple | Its publication, however, was unmarked by any major review. It was the first novel by DW
since her earliest of all not to be at least a Book Society
Recommendation, if not a Choice. DW |
Reception | E. H. Young | This time The Spectator, pursuing the line of excessive modernist influence, called EHY
a thicker-skinned Virginia Woolf
. . . but hardly less bogged in the undifferentiated welter of phenomenal experience. Mezei, Kathy, and Chiara Briganti. “’She must be a very good novelist’: Rereading E. H. Young (1880-1949)”. English Studies in Canada, Vol. 27 , No. 3, pp. 303-31. 307 |
No timeline events available.
No bibliographical results available.